There is no such thing as a good movie, objectively
speaking. Movies are art, and like all
art, their value is up to personal interpretation. The technical aspects of a movie can be
judged more bluntly. No one is going to
argue that a film is well lit if no one can see what’s happening, or praise the
camerawork if it’s all out of focus.
That is cut and dry. But no one
can tell you how a movie made you feel.
Sure, there can be a general consensus about what films are
good or bad. Ask most people and they
will agree that THE GODFATHER is a great movie.
There will be some debate over whether THE GODFATHER PART II is a better
movie. There will be very little debate
over whether THE GODFATHER PART III was the best in the series. But I guarantee you there is someone out
there who thinks that it is. He might
have severe mental and emotional issues, but his opinion is just as valid as
the rest of us.
Sure, society may attribute better taste and sophistication to
the person who appreciates Kurosawa and Truffaut films over the person who
loves Tyler Perry movies. And that is
most likely valid. But that doesn’t mean
YOJIMBO is a more enjoyable film that MADEA GOES TO JAIL. Your mileage may vary. Besides, I’m sure there are people out there
who enjoy both Kurosawa and Tyler Perry.
Nothing wrong with that. People talk about “guilty pleasure” movies as
an excuse, like they admit it is wrong, but despite their normally exquisite
cultural taste, they like it anyway. Why
should we feel guilty about a movie?
Feel guilty about cheating on your spouse, not about loving Chuck Norris
(unless you cheated on your spouse with Chuck Norris).
I’m a fan of many generally agreed upon “bad” movies. Some I like for specific reasons (LOST IN
SPACE – Gary Oldman, robots, ludicrousness), others are a complete mystery (THE
INCREDIBLE BURT WONDERSTONE - ???). But
I take particular joy in the more subterranean level of “badness”, movies that
are so indescribably weird that you need to reconfigure your brain to properly
enjoy them. Sometimes you have to let go
of concepts like logic, restraint, continuity, and talent, they just hold you
back. You have to let yourself dissolve
into a movie like FROZEN SCREAM (which contains a flashback within a flashback
within a dream sequence) and let it bash you around like a turbulent,
nonsensical sea. How else are you going
to deal with NIGHT TRAIN TO TERROR’s three unconnected movies edited down to
incoherence and wrapped around God and the Devil riding a train through space
with a constantly partying New Wave band?
Try watching Doris Wishman’s A NIGHT TO DISMEMBER in a rational mind
frame and your head will explode. You
need a different set of rules to truly appreciate Schizocinema.
[That was actually my third choice for the name. Do you know how many clever people are on the
internet? They’ve already taken every
freaking name you could possibly think of.
Stupid clever people.]
We will also be applying the Schizocinematic eye to other types of movies here, many commonly considered to be "good" movies. Even the most acclaimed movies have their share of quirks and seemingly odd choices, things that most people glaze over. Those will be the bits that I and my fellow Schizocinemanics will focus and expound on. In true schizo style, our outlook and opinions will be all over the map. Movie topics will likewise be scattershot. Sometimes we will
talk about obscure foreign films, or super low budget train wrecks, or Bond
films, or Flash Gordon (that will mostly be me). And largely we will be doing this to entertain
ourselves, but if people who are not us get the occasional kick out it, that’s
cool, too.
So welcome, everyone.
I guess that helps explain why my Jean-Luc Godard Collection is between Bubba Ho-Tep and The Pinky Violence Collection on my DVD shelf.
ReplyDelete