Showing posts with label Christopher George. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christopher George. Show all posts

Friday, April 1, 2016

Rip-off Round-Up: GRIZZLY



Between 1976 and 1983, approximately 80% of movies were rip-offs of JAWS [citation needed].  It was the DIE HARD on a…  of its day.  Just about every animal that could kill you, and some that couldn’t, got their own movie.  Aquatic creatures were popular, killer whales, piranha, alligators, other sharks, manta rays (which have no teeth), giant octopus, etc.  Land animals and assorted insects got a piece of the action, too.  It was a great bit of fear mongering.  No matter where you were on the planet, some animal wanted to kill you. Some of these movies, if not all, had merit.  One of the most meritorious was 1976’s jaws in conjunction with claws slaughterfest, GRIZZLY.

The Capsule:
A fifteen foot grizzly bear is snacking on hikers in a geographically unspecified National Park.  Hard-nosed park ranger Michael Kelly, played by perpetually hard-nosed Christopher George, is out to stop him.  He is aided by Don Strober, a pacifist helicopter pilot, and Arthur Scott, a naturalist who likes to wear deer skins and crawl on all fours.  As the bodies, or bits of bodies, pile up, the hunters take more desperate measures to bring the killer bear down.  Can they succeed before it eats every single person in the park?

Despite its wild divergence in style and quality, GRIZZLY follows the JAWS floorplan fairly closely.  Christopher George is a more rugged and angrier version of Sheriff Brodie.  Andrew Pine has the vehicle (helicopter instead of boat), so he’s kind of like Quint.  Richard Jaeckel’s batshit naturalist is more of a combination of Quint and Hooper, due to his into-the-jaws-of-the-beast obsessiveness.  Instead of the Mayor, there’s the Park Supervisor, who doesn’t want to “blow this out of proportion” and close the park.  He likes to give judgmental speeches and actually calls ranger Kelly a “maverick”.  Like the Mayor, he has the same stunned and stammering moment of defeat when he realizes he gravely underestimated things.  There are drunken hunters instead of drunken fishermen who mess things up.  There’s even a variation on Quint’s Indianapolis speech.  This movie is a totally different animal, though, and not just because it features a totally different animal.

First off, this movie is rated PG.  Now, so was JAWS, which is hard enough to believe, but GRIZZLY is ten times more violent than the shark movie.  The very first bear attack has a severed arm flying through the air and a victim-cam shot that probably inspired Sam Rami to do EVIL DEAD.  Faces are slashed, torsos are ripped open, unfriendly bear hugs are administered.  For the most part, these are not quick cuts.  The camera likes to linger.   When a photographer trips over a partially buried body, she doesn’t just land in a puddle of blood, her whole hand is submerged.  It’s a kiddy pool worth of blood.  The most famous scene is when the bear sneaks up on an adorable six year old boy (holding a fluffy rabbit, none the less).  We learn that in the aftermath of the attack, the boy has lost a leg.  This is cleverly implied by showing a six year old boy on the ground with his fucking leg ripped off.  Now, I’ve seen a lot of kids killed in a lot of movies, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen shit like that.  I know I haven’t seen it in a movie with the same rating as CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF MEATBALLS.  I am surprised every time I see this movie by just how violent and bloody it is.  I somehow filter it down in my memory, because of the rating.  It can’t be that bad, right?  But it is.  At one point, the grizzly attacks a man on horseback.  It knocks the horse’s entire head off!  Rated PG, no different than MADAGASCAR.  Practically the same film, really.  Fun day at the matinee for all the youngsters.  This leads me to two possible conclusions.   Either kids today are complete pussies, or what the fuck were our parents thinking?!?  After seeing JAWS at ten years old, I never went into more than eight inches of water at the beach.  If I had seen GRIZZLY as a kid, I never would have gone near trees again.  

Some JAWS rip-offs try to produce a little sympathy for the animal.  The beast is just part of nature, doing what it was born to do.  It’s us humans who have provoked it by messing with its habitat or depleting its food supply or destroying the ozone layer or something.  Not in this case.  This bear is a complete asshole.  There is no reason it should be attacking campers other than that they are tasty and fun to take apart.  I don’t think it’s even hungry most of the time.  A group of drunken hunters finds a bear cub and uses it as bait.  Instead of saving the cub, the grizzly just eats it.  It’s a dick even to other bears.

Just like the bear in THE REVENANT, it likes to mess with you, too.  When it gets ahold of [SPOILER] Scott, the batshit naturalist, it rips him to shreds but leaves him buried alive in a shallow grave (so it’s like the bear and Tom Hardy in one).   A little while after it leaves, Scott regains consciousness.  He slowly and painfully pulls himself from the grave.  After a huge effort, Scott turns around and the grizzly is just standing there, staring at him.  It’s a little hard to tell, since it’s a bear and all, but I’m pretty sure it was grinning.

The grizzly is such a coldblooded murderer that the film is practically a slasher film.  For the first half of the movie, its victims are women.  The movie uses a bear POV shot when it’s stalking its prey, like it’s an ursine Michael Myers.  It’s even breathing heavy when it watches them from behind the trees.  The whole thing is kind of pervy.   It goes so far as to kill a woman in a tent who’s preparing to have sex, so it’s one of those hypocritically Puritanical killers, too.  Sex equals mauling.  It even spies on a skinny dipper.  There’s no nudity, obviously.  This is a PG movie, for heaven’s sake.  She’s still in her underwear when the stream runs red with her blood.  

It’s also good at springing up from out of nowhere, which is impressive for a fifteen foot tall, two thousand pound bear.  

The bear is considerably smarter than any of the humans, individually or collectively.  It continually alludes, outmaneuvers, and ambushes its hunters.  Not that it’s really much of a challenge.  Christopher George is slightly more competent than in PIECES, but not by much.  The other rangers are even more useless.  One of them was the skinny dipper who decided to “soak her feet” in the middle of a goddamned killer bear hunt.  Another one can’t figure out how to shoot straight down while the grizzly knocks down his lookout tower.  
One of my favorite oddball scenes is right after the first attack.  A radio announcer encourages hikers to evacuate the area, and literally dozens of backpackers come running down the hill like they were on fire.  The only thing that was missing was a Three Stooges “whoo-whoo-whoo-whoo-whoo” sound effect.  I’m surprised the grizzly wasn’t waiting at the bottom of the hill with a napkin tied around his neck.

In the end, Christopher George and laid back helicopter pilot Andrew Prine are hunting the bear with a flamethrower and a bazooka.  Not the kind of equipment normally issued to park rangers, in my opinion.  Smoky would not approve.  To be fair, though, the only alternative at that point would be calling in an airstrike.  Considering the grizzly takes out the helicopter, that might not even have worked.  For a second, I thought they might lob off the bear’s head with the helicopter blades, but it was just a tease.  The actual demise of the grizzly is more of a clumsy—yet still awesome—take on the end of JAWS.  Christopher George can’t get it together enough to get out a quippy one-liner, though.  He seems disappointed about that.

Director William Girdler followed this up with DAY OF THE ANIMAL, also starring Christopher George and featuring the same bear actor (but playing much less of an asshole).  The main villain in that one, weirdly, was Leslie Nielsen.  He also did the completely insane Exorcist/Star Wars rip-off, THE MANITOU.  Unfortunately, he died in a helicopter accident while scouting locations in the Philippines a couple of years later.  He left a proud legacy of traumatizing a generation of children who caught this on afternoon TV, and of even more whose parents look at the rating and think, “Can’t be any worse than DESPICABLE ME.”

Friday, March 11, 2016

Exactly What You Think It Is: PIECES



Exploitation movies are known for giving the audience what they are looking for.  That's where the term comes from; they exploit the movie goer’s interests.  In this regard, all films could be called exploitation.  Certain movies are just more upfront and lowbrow about it.  It doesn’t mean that they are all uninspired garbage, though.  At its heart, JAWS is an exploitation movie, delivering the nudity, blood, and terror the audience craved.  It’s also wonderfully acted and expertly directed.  Exploitation can rise above its mandate to supply the goods. On the other end of the scale, they can also unapologetically wallow in those goods, filling the space in between misconceived, baffling nonsense.   These are great, too.  Case in point, PIECES.

The Capsule:
Boston, 1942, a mother finds her pre-teen son putting together a jigsaw puzzle of a naked woman and freaks the shit out.  The boy calmly listens to her shrieking, mirror smashing, anti-pornography rant and then chops her up with an axe.  Forty years later, at an unnamed college in Boston (or Madrid as Boston), female students are being carved up by a mysterious chainsaw killer.  Hard boiled cop Christopher George is brought in to find the murderer.  He sends in a former tennis star turned undercover lady cop to pose as a tennis coach.  Campus lothario Kendall, who knew some of the victims, is also included in the investigation because Christopher George “trusts him with his life”, despite just meeting him a few hours ago.  Meanwhile, the killer continues to disassemble nubile coeds in pursuit of his ultimate goal, putting together a jigsaw dreamgirl from the parts.  Can Tennis Cop stop the killer before her pieces are added to the puzzle?

PIECES is famous for being an early ‘80’s, ultra-gory trash masterpiece.  A trashterpiece, if you will.  Its reputation is well deserved.  It has one of my favorite tag lines ever, “It’s Exactly What You Think It Is” (right up there with ZOMBIE’s refreshingly straightforward “We Are Going To Eat You”).  And it is exactly what you think it is, to a degree.  If you think it is an excuse to show a lot of blood and boobs -- and I mean a lot -- then yes, it is exactly what you think it is.  As opposed to TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, which seemed so much more gruesome than what it actually shows on screen, PIECES leaves nothing to the imagination.  Even though the kills are insanely bloody, they are also fairly quick.  There are no protracted scenes of the victims suffering, and it isn’t even remotely realistic, so it’s less of the emotional barrage TCM was.  The kills aren’t exactly fun, but they aren’t a bummer, either.  They are supremely memorable, though.

PIECES is essentially an Italian giallo with gallons more blood.  There is an unseen killer wearing black gloves.  There are lots of red herrings.  One of the red herrings is Paul Smith, the perpetually glaring man-mountain who played Bluto in POPEYE.  Since his character Willard is the grounds keeper who is seen lugging around a chainsaw, he is such an obvious suspect that there is no way it could be him (not to mention that the shrouded killer is clearly not Bluto shaped).  I wish he was the killer, though.  It would have given him more screen time.  Every second he is on camera is amazing.  He looks at every single character with such unconcealed disdain and anger that he seems to be using every ounce of restraint not to murder them right there.  I don’t think he would even need the chainsaw, he would just tear people apart with his bare hands.  There should have been a spin off series just about him going about his normal day, having to deal with people at the bank or the DMV.  It would have been hilarious.  

I’m not going to lie, it’s not the greatest depiction of women in cinema.  Most are there to be victims, and most are naked at some point. There is a moderately good role for Lynda Day George (wife of Christopher) in the form of Tennis Cop.  I love that it’s never addressed how odd of a career change it is going from famous tennis star to undercover cop.  Guess it happens more often than I’m aware.  Anyway, Tennis Cop does play a lot of tennis (including a great crowd shot of people moving their heads left to right and back again, some out of rhythm), but she gets at least one great action scene.  She’s walking the campus at night, hunting for the killer. She turns a corner and comes face to face with… a random kung fu fighter.  He throws down a wave of punches and spin kicks, knocking away her gun and sending her to the ground, only to be taken down by a swift kick to the balls.  As Tennis Cop is recovering, Kendall rides up on a motorcycle and says “Hey, that’s my kung fu professor.”  The professor jumps up and acts like the whole unprovoked attack was just a gag.  Then he runs off never to be seen again.  I guess that makes sense, because… what the fuck?

Aside from that dramatic interlude, the cops are pretty much worthless.  They ignore the literally gallons of forensic evidence and spend almost the entire movie aimlessly wandering around just looking for a guy with a chainsaw.  They even fail at that. Several killings are done in broad daylight, the killer makes a huge amount of noise, and a chainsaw is one of the more awkward murder weapons to conceal.  The murderer does manage to successfully hide it behind his back when getting into a tiny elevator with a victim, however, so it’s not just the cops who are oblivious.  Christopher George does yell at a lot of people, I guess that helps?

The killer’s traumatic backstory is pretty fantastic.  It’s not as much of a wild overreaction as the spurned Valentine giver in X-RAY.  From the mother’s behavior, it’s clear this wasn’t the boy’s first experience with her full-on man-hating crazy bomb.  It wasn’t a healthy environment to grow up in.  Things were probably leading up to this for a while.  His reaction is a bit extreme, but understandable.  What I don’t understand is why he waited 40 years before going ape shit psycho again.  After his initial mommy murder, he clearly went on to lead a successful, non-dismembering life.  He rose to a respected position at Unnamed College.  He’s well established in the community.  People like him.  And then for no apparent reason he decides to embark on a very messy quest to make a mix-and-match replacement mommy.  There is one strange scene about a student skateboarder going through a huge mirror that two movers are carrying Three Stooges style, but the actual impact was only implied and there was no mention about what became of her.  This is after the killer brings out his bloodstained nudie puzzle, so even if he had witnessed the (presumably) sliced up student, he was already on the Dr. Frankenstein route.  Was it just really, really far down on his to-do list?  “Well, finally got those gutters cleaned out, might as well get to that chainsaw massacre I’ve been putting off.”

Of course, the what-the-fuckiest moment is the last scene in the movie.  SPOILER for those who like having their minds boggled.  The killer has been shot and things are wrapping up when the spunky but useless Kendall discovers the sewn together composite corpse the killer was building.  It falls on him in slow motion, totally freaking him out.  Nice little payoff for what was only alluded to throughout the movie.  The real surprise happens after he’s recovered from that shock.  Everyone is leaving and he turns back to grab his jacket.  Suddenly, the corpse reaches up, grabs Kendall by the crotch, and crushes his balls.  The End.  This isn’t a CARRIE style dream, nobody wakes up.  There’s no indication why the completely non-supernatural movie now has a reanimated corpse.   It’s just a squish and roll credits, leaving you to puzzle it out.  As far as surprise castration endings go, that was a good one.  Maybe it wasn’t exactly what you thought it was after all.

C Chaka